Tuesday, January 26, 2010

The Fallacy of Hospital Ratings.

Shantell Kirkendoll writes at University of Michigan's Medical news blog, UMHS Newsroom, that popular, respected hospital ratings may be good for marketing but they don't accurately reflect the care provided by a hospital:

New research published in the January issue of the Journal of the American College of Surgeons finds that while popular hospital rating systems can help identify high-quality hospitals for cardiovascular operations, patients can achieve similar outcomes by seeking care at high-volume hospitals closer to home.

Hospital quality ratings have become a source of bragging rights for many hospitals, and they receive substantial attention from both the public and media. Two of the most recognized ratings are the U.S. News and World Report’s “America’s Best Hospitals” and HealthGrades’ “America’s 50 Best Hospitals.” Although patients and caregivers increasingly use these quality ratings to choose hospitals, the relationship between ratings and outcomes remains unclear.
This research is the first of its kind that addresses the important question of whether surgical outcomes at the highly rated hospitals are better than surgical outcomes at other hospitals in the United States.
“Both the U.S. News and World Report and HealthGrades quality rating systems are frequently used for hospital marketing. Our study shows that current hospital ratings systems are no better in judging the quality of hospitals than are procedural volumes,” according to Nicholas Osborne, M.D., Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholar at the University of Michigan Medical School.

Labels: ,


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home