Friday, January 22, 2010

Frenzy of Compassion: Medea and Britain's Mom Mercy Killers.

From, a summary of the two mercy killing cases in Britain.

Two mothers who have taken the lives of their severely disabled children are in this article oddly summarized as "separated from their husbands, with whom they were still on good terms, but they made the decision alone after working themselves into a frenzy of compassion."

I wonder if the implication of the last phrase is something like that common female derangement, hysteria? Why else would someone choose death if not crazy? Why else would one consider the "murder" of their loved one if not in a frenzy? I doubt "frenzy of compassion" and the marital status of the women would be so blatantly framed as "causes" of the deaths had the actors been men.

The article seems to reach to that other ancient "mercy killing" mother archetype, Medea, who killed her two beloved children to get back at Jason, her philandering husband, to save them from a life of shame and debasement. Like Medea they are described as in a frenzy, like Medea they look to that modern oracle, the internet, for answers, and like Media they are bound for banishment from society.

Here's the rest of the article, by Michael Cook:

Mrs Francis InglisAssisted suicide is never long out of the headlines in England, it seems. This week they featured two devoted mothers who killed their disabled children. In the first case, 57-year-old Frances Inglis was sentenced to life imprisonment for giving her brain-damaged 22-year-old son Thomas a lethal dose of heroin in November 2008. She will have to serve a minimum sentence of 9 years.

In 2007 Thomas was injured in a brawl and taken unwillingly to a hospital by ambulance. He jumped out while it was moving and ended up with severe brain damage. She believed that since then he had been living a life of "horror, pain and tragedy'' and she was determined to bring it to an end. In September 2007 she injected her son with heroin, but he was resuscitated. She denied her involvement after she was arrested. While on bail for attempted murder, she obtained 10 packets of heroin for £200, and injected him again.

Mrs Inglish told the court that she had no choice: "The definition of murder is to take someone's life with malice in your heart. I did it with love in my heart for Tom, so I don't see it as murder. I knew what I was doing was against the law." However, prosecuting lawyer Miranda Moore said in her closing statement: "It is a tragic case but it is not a defence to murder to end someone's life to put them out of their misery.''

In a similar case which is still being tried, 55-year-old Kay Gilderdale gave her 31-year-old daughter sleeping pills, anti-depresssants and morphine to help her to commit suicide. Her daughter Lynn had been mute and bed-ridden since she was 14 after contracting myalgic encephalomyelitis.

The two stories have common features. Both women were separated from their husbands, with whom they were still on good terms, but they made the decision alone after working themselves into a frenzy of compassion. And both relied upon the internet for finding information about their children's condition and how to kill them. Mrs Gilderdale was reading about euthanasia campaigner Dr Philip Nitschke as her daughter was dying. -- London Telegraph, Jan 20; BBC, Jan 20

Labels: ,


Anonymous dedicatedserver06 said...

Pretty cool post. Your focus is awesome and a great example for others. I will try as much as possible to improve on my skills from the advices in the article. Thanks a lot for the information. I really need this.

February 11, 2010 at 2:47 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home